4.8 Article

Chromosome-scale pseudomolecules refined by optical, physical and genetic maps in flax

期刊

PLANT JOURNAL
卷 95, 期 2, 页码 371-384

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13944

关键词

optical mapping; BioNano technology; genome sequencing; physical map; genetic map; genome finishing; flax; Linum usitatissimum

资金

  1. Total Utilization Flax GENomics (TUFGEN) - Genome Canada
  2. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada - Western Grain Research Foundation (WGRF) [1142]
  3. project 948' of the Ministry of Agriculture of China [2015-Z41]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genomes of varying sizes have been sequenced with next-generation sequencing platforms. However, most reference sequences include draft unordered scaffolds containing chimeras caused by mis-scaffolding. A BioNano genome (BNG) optical map was constructed to improve the previously sequenced flax genome (Linum usitatissimum L., 2n = 30, about 373Mb), which consisted of 3852 scaffolds larger than 1kb and totalling 300.6 Mb. The high-resolution BNG map of cv. CDC Bethune totalled 317 Mb and consisted of 251 BNG contigs with an N50 of 2.15 Mb. A total of 622 scaffolds (286.6 Mb, 94.9%) aligned to 211 BNG contigs (298.6 Mb, 94.2%). Of those, 99 scaffolds, diagnosed to contain assembly errors, were refined into 225 new scaffolds. Using the newly refined scaffold sequences and the validated bacterial artificial chromosome-based physical map of CDC Bethune, the 211 BNG contigs were scaffolded into 94 super-BNG contigs (N50 of 6.64 Mb) that were further assigned to the 15 flax chromosomes using the genetic map. The pseudo-molecules total about 316 Mb, with individual chromosomes of 15.6 to 29.4 Mb, and cover 97% of the annotated genes. Evidence from the chromosome-scale pseudomolecules suggests that flax has undergone palaeopolyploidization and mesopolyploidization events, followed by rearrangements and deletions or fusion of chromosome arms from an ancient progenitor with a haploid chromosome number of eight.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据