4.8 Article

Sucrose breakdown within guard cells provides substrates for glycolysis and glutamine biosynthesis during light-induced stomatal opening

期刊

PLANT JOURNAL
卷 94, 期 4, 页码 583-594

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13889

关键词

stomatal movements; sucrose; guard cell metabolism; TCA cycle; glycolysis; stable isotope labelling analysis

资金

  1. Max-Planck Society
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq-Brazil)
  3. Foundation for Research Assistance of Minas Gerais State (FAPEMIG-Brazil)
  4. Foundation for Support of Scientific and Technological Development of Ceara (FUNCAP)
  5. CNPq [402511/2016-6]
  6. FAPEMIG [CRA-BDS-00020-16, APQ-01078-15, APQ-01357-14, RED-00053-16]
  7. FUNCAP grant [AEP-0128-00092.01.00/17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sucrose has long been thought to play an osmolytic role in stomatal opening. However, recent evidence supports the idea that the role of sucrose in this process is primarily energetic. Here we used a combination of stomatal aperture assays and kinetic [U-C-13]-sucrose isotope labelling experiments to confirm that sucrose is degraded during light-induced stomatal opening and to define the fate of the C released from sucrose breakdown. We additionally show that addition of sucrose to the medium did not enhance light-induced stomatal opening. The isotope experiment showed a consistent C-13 enrichment in fructose and glucose, indicating that during light-induced stomatal opening sucrose is indeed degraded. We also observed a clear C-13 enrichment in glutamate and glutamine (Gln), suggesting a concerted activation of sucrose degradation, glycolysis and the tricarboxylic acid cycle. This is in contrast to the situation for Gln biosynthesis in leaves under light, which has been demonstrated to rely on previously stored C. Our results thus collectively allow us to redraw current models concerning the influence of sucrose during light-induced stomatal opening, in which, instead of being accumulated, sucrose is degraded providing C skeletons for Gln biosynthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据