4.7 Article

Identification and Characterization of Alternaria Species Associated with Moldy Core of Apple in Chile

期刊

PLANT DISEASE
卷 102, 期 11, 页码 2158-2169

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-02-18-0282-RE

关键词

-

资金

  1. Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT) project Beca Doctorado [Folio 21141074]
  2. CONICYT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Moldy core (MC) of apple is an important disease in Chile, with prevalence observed between 4 and 46% in Fuji, Oregon Spur Red Chief, and Scarlet apple in the 2014-15 and 2015-16 growing seasons. However, there is no information on the identity of the causal agents associated with MC in Chile. The analysis of 653 MC fruit revealed the presence of several genera of filamentous fungi. However, species of Alternaria (67.7%) were by far the most frequently fungi isolated. In total, 41 Alternaria isolates were characterized morphologically and molecularly using Alternaria major allergen Alt al, calmodulin, and plasma membrane ATPase gene regions. Six small-spored Alternaria spp. were identified; namely, in order of importance, Alternaria tenuissima, A. arborescens, A. alternata, and A. dumosa in sect. Alternaria; A. frumenti in sect. Infectoriae; and A. kordkuyana in sect. Pseudoalternaria. MC symptoms were reproducible and consisted of a light gray to dark olive-green mycelium over the carpel and seed of immature and mature fruit, confirming that the isolates of these Alternaria spp. were pathogenic. These isolates caused brown necrotic lesions with concentric rings on wounded detached apple leaves. This study demonstrated that at least six Alternaria spp. are the cause of MC of apple in Chile. These Alternaria spp. were isolated alone, or with two or more species coexisting in the same fruit. This is the first report of A. tenuissima, A. arborescens, A. frumenti, A. dumosa, and A. kordkuyana associated with MC of apple in Chile and the first report of A. frumenti, A. kordkuyana, and A. dumosa causing MC of apple worldwide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据