4.7 Article

Maslinic acid induces autophagy by down-regulating HSPA8 in pancreatic cancer cells

期刊

PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
卷 32, 期 7, 页码 1320-1331

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ptr.6064

关键词

autophagy; HSPA8; maslinic acid; pancreatic cancer

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81302906]
  2. Project of High-level Teachers in Beijing Municipal Universities in the Period of 13th 5-year Plan [CITTCD201804086]
  3. Zibo Development Program of Sci. & Tech, in Shandong, China [2016KJ100048]
  4. Natural Science Foundation and Key Res. Project of Shandong, China [2016GSF201183, ZR2014HQ031]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of China [41306157, 81774191, 81573457, 81773776]
  6. National Innovative Drug Development Project of China [2014ZX-09102043-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maslinic acid (MA), a natural pentacyclictriterpene, displays cytotoxic activity on various types of cancer cells. However, its underlying mechanism is unclear. In this study, we assessed the effect of MA on autophagy of human pancreatic cancer cells, and the potential autophagic pathway was presented. MA inhibited the proliferation and induced autophagy of Panc-28 cells by altering the expressions of autophagy related proteins. SDS-PAGE analysis revealed that one protein band was significantly down-regulated in cells treated with MA, and the band was identified as heat shock protein HSPA8 as analyzed using Western blot and MS, MS/MS approaches. HSPA8 knockdown could significantly inhibit cell viability and enhance the cytotoxic effects of MA, whereas HSPA8 overexpression was able to enhance cell viability, diminishing the effects of MA. Western blot analysis indicated that the effect of MA on the expression of autophagy related genes was increased significantly in cells treated with HSPA8 inhibitor VER-155008, whereas HSPA8 inducer geranylgeranylacetone antagonized the effects of MA. Our study provides evidence that MA is able to induce of autophagy via down-regulation of HSPA8 in Panc-28 cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据