4.7 Article

Preparation and modification of activated carbon for benzene adsorption by steam activation in the presence of KOH

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2013.05.015

关键词

Activated carbon; Steam activation; Surface modification; Benzene; Potassium hydroxide

资金

  1. Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of Central Colleges [2009KH10]
  2. Beijing Postdoctoral Fund [B148]
  3. Green Shoots Plan of Beijing Academy of Science and Technology of China [B142]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of activated carbons from Taixi anthracite were prepared by steam activation in the presence of KOH and then they were modified by different methods. The regulation of porosity and the modification of surface chemistry were carried out with the aim to improve the benzene adsorption capacity of activated carbon. The influences of KOH and activation process parameters including activation temperature, activation time and steam flow rate on porosity of activated carbon were evaluated, and the effect of modification methods on surface chemistry was investigated. Also, the relationship between benzene adsorption capacity and porosity and surface chemistry was analyzed. Results show that activation temperature is the dominant factor in the activation process; the introduction of KOH into the raw material can enhance the reactivity of char in activation process, meanwhile it shows a negative effect on the porosity development, especially on the mesopore development. Results of FTIR analysis indicate that anthracite-based activated carbon with condensed aromatics and chemically inert oxygen does not present the nature to be surface modified. Besides, benzene adsorption capacity has an approximate linear relationship with surface area and in our preparation, benzene adsorption capacity and surface area of activated carbon are up to 1210 m(2)/g and 423 mg/g, respectively. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of China University of Mining & Technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据