4.8 Article

Mapping the Complete Reaction Path of a Complex Photochemical Reaction

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 120, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.183003

关键词

-

资金

  1. STFC
  2. European Commissions' Seventh Framework Program (LASERLAB-EUROPE) [228334]
  3. Leverhulme Trust [RPG-2013-365]
  4. Royal Society [UF100047, UF150655, RG110310]
  5. European Union [FP7-PEOPLE-2013-CIG-NEWLIGHT]
  6. Carnegie Trust
  7. University of Edinburgh
  8. University of Southampton
  9. excellence cluster The Hamburg Center for Ultrafast Imaging-Structure, Dynamics and Control of Matter at the Atomic Scale of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grant Agreement CUI) [DFG-EXC1074]
  10. European Research Council through the Consolidator Grant [Kupper-614507-COMOTION]
  11. Helmholtz Gemeinschaft through the Impuls- und Vernetzungsfond
  12. EPSRC [1839943] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We probe the dynamics of dissociating CS2 molecules across the entire reaction pathway upon excitation. Photoelectron spectroscopy measurements using laboratory-generated femtosecond extreme ultraviolet pulses monitor the competing dissociation, internal conversion, and intersystem crossing dynamics. Dissociation occurs either in the initially excited singlet manifold or, via intersystem crossing, in the triplet manifold. Both product channels are monitored and show that, despite being more rapid, the singlet dissociation is the minor product and that triplet state products dominate the final yield. We explain this by a consideration of accurate potential energy curves for both the singlet and triplet states. We propose that rapid internal conversion stabilizes the singlet population dynamically, allowing for singlet-triplet relaxation via intersystem crossing and the efficient formation of spin-forbidden dissociation products on longer timescales. The study demonstrates the importance of measuring the full reaction pathway for defining accurate reaction mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据