4.4 Article

Photodynamic therapy using pheophorbide and 670 nm LEDs exhibits anticancer effects in-vitro in androgen dependent prostate cancer

期刊

PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY
卷 21, 期 -, 页码 130-137

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2017.10.026

关键词

Prostate cancer; Androgen dependent prostate cancer (ADPC); Photodynamic therapy (PDT); Pheophorbide; Reactive oxygen species (ROS)

类别

资金

  1. University of Illinois, College of Medicine at Rockford
  2. Brovember Inc., Rockford, IL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the third leading cause of death in men in the United States and its treatment options include surgery, anti-hormonal drugs for androgen sensitive tumors, and radiotherapy. An alternative treatment is the use of photodynamic therapy (PDT), which involves the activation of a photosensitizer by a defined wavelength of light in the presence of oxygen, generating transient concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS). In this study, we explored the anti-cancer potential and mechanism of action of PDT using pheophorbide (Pheo) as a photosensitizer in combination with 670 nm LEDs. Our hypothesis was that Pheo-PDT combination will demonstrate anti-cancer activity against androgen dependent PCa (ADPC), suggesting an alternative and less toxic cancer treatment. Pheo-PDT demonstrated significant anti-cancer activity against ADPC in as little as 5 J/cm(2) with increased effects, in a Pheo concentration dependent manner. We also observed in vitro inhibition in the clonogenic potential, as well as significant inhibition of invasion and migration, implicating the anti-metastatic activity of Pheo-PDT on PCa. Furthermore, Pheo-PDT caused G(0)/G(1) cell cycle arrest. The oncolytic activity of PDT involves the generation of ROS, and we demonstrated immediate ROS formation subsequent to Pheo-PDT as well. Mechanistic analysis suggested that the anti-cancer activity of Pheo-PDT is via ER stress, along with inhibition of important cell growth and proliferation

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据