4.4 Article

Photophysical and Photochemical Properties of 3-methylpterin as a New and More Stable Pterin-type Photosensitizer

期刊

PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY
卷 94, 期 5, 页码 881-889

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/php.12931

关键词

-

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET) [PIP 112-200901-00425, PUE IQUIR 2016]
  2. Agencia de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (ANPCyT) [PICT-2012-0508, PICT-2015-2173]
  3. Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP) [X712]
  4. ANPCyT
  5. CONICET

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pterin derivatives are heterocyclic compounds which are present in different biological systems. Neutral aqueous solutions of pterins present acid-base and keto-enol equilibria. These compounds, under UV-A radiation fluoresce, undergo photooxidation, generate reactive oxygen species and photoinduce the oxidation of biological substrates. As photosensitizers, they may act through different mechanisms, mainly through an electron transfer-initiated process (type-I mechanism), but they also produce singlet molecular oxygen (O-1(2)) upon irradiation (type-II mechanism). In general, upon UV-A excitation two triplet states, corresponding to the lactim and lactam tautomers, are formed, but only the last one is the responsible for the photosensitized reactions of biomolecules. We present a study of the photochemical properties of 3-methylpterin (3-Mep) which, in contrast to most pterin derivatives, exists only in the lactam form. Also an improvement in the synthesis of 3-Mep is reported. The spectroscopic properties 3-Mep in aqueous solution were similar to those of the unsubstituted pterin derivative (Ptr) in its acid form, such as absorption, fluorescent and phosphorescent emission spectra. Experiments using 2'-deoxyguanosine 5'-monophosphate (dGMP) as oxidizable target demonstrated that methylation at C-3 position of the pterin moiety does not affect significantly the efficiency of photosensitization, but results in a more photostable sensitizer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据