4.6 Review

Health hazards to wild birds and risk factors associated with anthropogenic food provisioning

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0091

关键词

garden bird feeding; epidemiology; finch trichomonosis; Paridae pox; passerine salmonellosis; mycotoxin

类别

资金

  1. Wild Bird Mortality Project [19922004]
  2. Garden Bird Health Initiative
  3. Birdcare Standards Association
  4. British Trust for Ornithology
  5. British Veterinary Association Animal Welfare Foundation
  6. CJ Wildbird Foods, Cranswick Pet Products, Defra
  7. Welsh Government through the Animal and Plant Health Agency's Diseases of Wildlife Scanning Surveillance Scheme (APHA DoWS) [ED1600]
  8. Defra Strategic Evidence Fund [WC 1027]
  9. Esmee Fairbairn Foundation [11-0701, 15-3008]
  10. Gardman Ltd
  11. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
  12. Tom Chambers Ltd
  13. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare
  14. Zoological Society of London

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Provision of supplementary food for wild birds at garden feeding stations is a common, large-scale and year-round practice in multiple countries including Great Britain (GB). While these additional dietary resources can benefit wildlife, there is a concomitant risk of disease transmission, particularly when birds repeatedly congregate in the same place at high densities and through interactions of species that would not normally associate in close proximity. Citizen science schemes recording garden birds are popular and can integrate disease surveillance with population monitoring, offering a unique opportunity to explore inter-relationships between supplementary feeding, disease epidemiology and population dynamics. Here, we present findings from a national surveillance programme in GB and note the dynamism of endemic and emerging diseases over a 25-year period, focusing on protozoal (finch trichomonosis), viral (Paridae pox) and bacterial (passerine salmonellosis) diseases with contrasting modes of transmission. We also examine the occurrence of mycotoxin contamination of food residues in bird feeders, which present both a direct and indirect (though immunosuppression) risk to wild bird health. Our results inform evidence-based mitigation strategies to minimize anthropogenically mediated health hazards, while maintaining the benefits of providing supplementary food for wild birds. This article is part of the theme issue 'Anthropogenic resource subsidies and host-parasite dynamics in wildlife'.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据