4.6 Review

The fetal programming of telomere biology hypothesis: an update

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0151

关键词

telomere; telomerase; development; fetal programming; health and disease risk

类别

资金

  1. U.S. Public Health Service (National Institutes of Health) [R01 AG-050455, R01 HD-060628, R01 HD-065825, UG3 OD-023349]
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01KR1301A]
  3. [ESR 678073]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research on mechanisms underlying fetal programming of health and disease risk has focused primarily on processes that are specific to cell types, organs or phenotypes of interest. However, the observation that developmental conditions concomitantly influence a diverse set of phenotypes, the majority of which are implicated in age-related disorders, raises the possibility that such developmental conditions may additionally exert effects via a common underlying mechanism that involves cellular/molecular ageing-related processes. In this context, we submit that telomere biology represents a process of particular interest in humans because, firstly, this system represents among the most salient antecedent cellular phenotypes for common age-related disorders; secondly, its initial (newborn) setting appears to be particularly important for its long-term effects; and thirdly, its initial setting appears to be plastic and under developmental regulation. We propose that the effects of suboptimal intrauterine conditions on the initial setting of telomere length and telomerase expression/activity capacity may be mediated by the programming actions of stress-related maternal-placental-fetal oxidative, immune, endocrine and metabolic pathways in a manner that may ultimately accelerate cellular dysfunction, ageing and disease susceptibility over the lifespan. This perspectives paper provides an overviewof each of the elements underlying this hypothesis, with an emphasis on recent developments, findings and future directions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据