4.4 Article

Stereoselective Inhibition of Renal Basolateral Human Organic Anion Transporter 3 by Lansoprazole Enantiomers

期刊

PHARMACOLOGY
卷 101, 期 3-4, 页码 176-183

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000485920

关键词

Drug interaction; Enantiomer; Lansoprazole; Organic anion transporter 3; Stereoselective inhibition

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [26460195, 26460196]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K08411, 17K08412] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lansoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor, potently inhibits human organic anion transporter, hOAT3 (SLC22A8). Lansoprazole has an asymmetric atom in its structure and is clinically administered as a racemic mixture of (R)-and (S)-enantiomers. However, little is known about the stereoselective inhibitory potencies of lansoprazole against hOAT3 and its homolog, hOAT1. In the present study, the stereoselective inhibitory effect of lansoprazole was evaluated using hOAT1-and hOAT3-expressing cultured cells. hOAT1 and hOAT3 transported [C-14]p-aminohippurate and [H-3]estrone-3-sulfate (ES) with Michaelis-Menten constants of 29.8 +/- 4.0 and 30.1 +/- 9.0 mu mol/L respectively. Lansoprazole enantiomers inhibited hOAT1-and hOAT3-mediated transport of each substrate in a concentration-dependent manner. The IC50 value of (S)-lansoprazole against hOAT3-mediated transport of [H-3] ES (0.61 +/- 0.08 mu mol/L) was significantly lower than that of (R)-lansoprazole (1.75 +/- 0.31 mu mol/L). In contrast, stereoselectivity was not demonstrated for the inhibition of hOAT1. Furthermore, (S)-lansoprazole inhibited hOAT3-mediated transport of pemetrexed and methotrexate (hOAT3 substrates) more strongly than the corresponding (R)-lansoprazole. This study is the first to demonstrate that the stereoselective inhibitory potency of (S)-lansoprazole against hOAT3 is greater than that of (R)-lansoprazole. The present findings provide novel information about the drug interactions associated with lansoprazole. (C) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据