3.8 Article

Colonoscopy in rats: An endoscopic, histological and tomographic study

期刊

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i5.226

关键词

Rat; Colonoscopy; Tomography; Colon anatomy; Histological measurements

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIM: To describe colon anatomy with colonoscopy and computed tomography (CT) to develop a rat model for future studies of therapeutic colonoscopy. METHODS: Eighteen male Sprague-Dawley rats, on average 400-420 g, underwent total colonoscopy, CT and histological examination. Colonoscopy was performed after bowel preparation with a baby upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with an outer diameter of 6.7 mm. CT obtained a 3D image of total colon after a rectal enema with radiological contrast. Macroscopic and microscopic examinations were examined with a conventional technique (hematoxylin and eosin). Colonic wall thickness, length and diameter measurements were taken from the anus, 3, 7, 14 and 20 cm from the anal margin. RESULTS: The median colonoscope depth was 24 cm (range 20-28 cm). Endoscopic and tomographic study of colon morphology showed an easy access with tubular morphology in the entire left colon (proximal left colon and rectum). Transverse colon was unapparent on colonoscopy. Right colon, proximal to the splenic flexure, was the largest part of the colon and assumed saccular morphology with tangential trabecula. Radiological measurements of the colonic length and diameter substantiate a subdivision of the right colon into two parts, the cecum and distal right colon. In addition, histological measurement of the colonic wall thickness confirmed a progressive decrease from rectum to cecum. The muscular layer was thinner in the proximal left colon. CONCLUSION: The combination of colonoscopy, tomography and histology leads to a better characterization of the entire colon. These data are important for deciding when to perform endoscopic resections or when to induce perforations to apply endoscopic treatments. (C) 2013 Baishideng. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据