4.2 Article

Validation of body mass index (BMI)-related ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM administrative diagnosis codes recorded in US claims data

期刊

PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY
卷 27, 期 10, 页码 1092-1100

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pds.4617

关键词

body mass index (BMI); health care administrative data; obesity; pharmacoepidemiology; positive predictive value; sensitivity; validation

资金

  1. Johnson Johnson, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To quantify the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of body mass index (BMI)-related ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes in claims data. MethodsResultsDe-identified electronic health record (EHR) and claims data were obtained from the Optum Integrated Claims-Clinical Database for cross-sections of commercial and Medicare Advantage health plan members age20years in 2013, 2014, and 2016. In each calendar year, health plan members' BMI as coded in the insurance claims data (error-prone measure) was compared with their BMI as recorded in the EHR (gold standard) to estimate the sensitivity and PPV of BMI-related ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes. The unit of analysis was the person-year. The study sample included 746763 distinct health plan members who contributed 1116283 eligible person-years (median age 56years; 57% female; 65% commercially insured and 35% with Medicare Advantage). BMI-related diagnoses were coded for 14.6%. The sensitivity of BMI-related diagnoses codes for the detection of underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obesity was 10.1%, 3.7%, 6.0%, and 25.2%, and the PPV was 49.0% for underweight, 89.6% for normal weight, 73.4% for overweight, and 92.4% for obesity, respectively. The sensitivity of BMI-related diagnosis codes was higher in the ICD-10-CM era relative to the ICD-9-CM era. ConclusionsThe PPV of BMI-related diagnosis codes for normal weight, overweight, and obesity was high (>70%) but the sensitivity was low (<30%). BMI-related diagnoses were more likely to be coded in patients with class II or III obesity (BMI 35kg/m(2)), and in 2016 relative to 2013 or 2014.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据