4.5 Article

Impact of Buffer, Protein Concentration and Sucrose Addition on the Aggregation and Particle Formation during Freezing and Thawing

期刊

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
卷 35, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-018-2378-5

关键词

buffer and mAb formulation; cryomicroscopy; freezing; particle formation; thawing

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  2. Austrian Science Fund FWF [I1392]
  3. Sandoz GmbH, Austria/Lek Menges, Slovenia
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I1392] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose This study addresses the effect of freezing and thawing on a therapeuticmonoclonal antibody (mAb) solution and the corresponding buffer formulation. Particle formation, crystallization behaviour, morphology changes and cryoconcentration effects were studied after varying the freezing and thawing rates, buffer formulation and protein concentration. The impact of undergoing multiple freeze/thaw (FT)cycles at controlled and uncontrolled temperature rates on mAb solutions was investigated in terms of particle formation. Methods Physicochemical characteristics were analysed by Differential Scanning Calorimetry whereas morphology changes are visualized by cryomicroscopy measurements. Micro Flow Imaging, Archimedes and Dynamic Light Scattering were used to investigate particle formation. Results Data retrieved in the present study emphasizes the damage caused by multiple FT-cyles and the need for sucrose as a cryoprotectant preventing coldcrystallization specifically at high protein concentrations. Low protein concentrations cause an increase of micron particle formation. Low freezing rates lead to a decreased particle number with increased particle diameter. Conclusion The overall goal of this research is to gain a better understanding of the freezing and thawing behaviour of mAb solutions with the ultimate aim to optimize this process step by reducing the unwanted particle formation, which also includes protein aggregates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据