4.7 Article

Narrow windrow burning canola (Brassica napus L.) residue for Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary sclerotia destruction

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 74, 期 11, 页码 2594-2600

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ps.5049

关键词

canola; disease inoculum; harvest weed seed control; narrow windrow burning; sclerotia; Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib) de Bary; sclerotinia stem rot

资金

  1. Honours Scholarship from the Western Australian State Governments Science and Agribusiness Connect Initiative - Royalties for Regions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of herbicide-tolerant varieties of canola (Brassica napus L.) in 1993, global plantings have increased resulting in an increased incidence of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary infections. Developments in narrow windrow burning techniques to destroy the seed of multiple herbicide-resistant weeds provide an opportunity to also intercept and heat-treat the S. sclerotiorum inoculum source, termed sclerotia, before it re-enters the soil to infect susceptible crop species in successive years. RESULTS: Preliminary kiln studies determined that a temperature of 264 degrees C for 10 s was needed to destroy S. sclerotiorum sclerotia viability (LT99) of sclerotia < 3 mm in diameter, whereas temperatures of 353 and 362 degrees C for the same duration were required to kill sclerotia (LT99) of 3-4 and > 4 mm in diameter respectively. In the field, temperatures > 500 degrees C were maintained in the centre of burning narrow windrows of canola residue for > 450 s and 300 degrees C was maintained consistently at either edge of the windrows for the same duration. The temperatures achieved when burning canola narrow windrows were sufficient to kill all sclerotia concentrated into the narrow windrow. CONCLUSION: As a technique, narrow windrow burning of canola residue provides the temperature and temperature durations required to kill S. sclerotiorum sclerotia, thus providing a non-fungicidal control option as part of a wider integrated disease management approach. (C) 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据