4.4 Article

Grouper (Epinephelus coioides) antimicrobial peptide epinecidin-1 exhibits antiviral activity against foot-and-mouth disease virus in vitro

期刊

PEPTIDES
卷 106, 期 -, 页码 91-95

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2018.07.003

关键词

Antimicrobial peptide; Epinecidin-1; Foot and mouth disease virus

资金

  1. Marine Research Station, Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Jiaushi, Ilan, Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Picornavirus is a highly contagious virus that usually infects cloven hoofed animals and causes foot-and-mouth disease. This disease is a major threat to livestock breeding worldwide and may lead to huge economic losses. Because effective vaccines or antiviral drugs remain unavailable, the search for new agents to combat FMDV infections is ongoing. Antimicrobial peptides are known to possess a broad range of biological activities, including antibacterial, antiviral, antitumor and immunomodulatory effects. In this work, we used a cell culture FMDV replication assay to evaluate several antimicrobial peptides for their ability to act as antiviral agents. We found that a synthesized form of the Epinephelus coioides antimicrobial peptide, epinecidin-1 (Epi-1), was effective at combatting FMDV. Epi-1 is known to have broad spectrum antimicrobial activity and low toxicity to normal eukaryotic cells, making it a good candidate for use as a therapeutic agent. The 50% cytotoxic concentration (CC50) for BHK-21 cells was 19.5 mu g/ml for synthesized Epi-1, and the 50% effective concentration (EC50) for viral inhibition was 0.6 mu g/ml. The selectivity index was 31.4, as calculated by the CC50/EC50 ratio. Furthermore, Epi-1 showed virucidal activity against FMDV at high concentrations. Interestingly, our data also showed that FMDV infection was most impaired when Epi-1 was treated at the time of viral adsorption. Taken together, our data show that Epi-1 may be a promising candidate for development as an anti-FMDV agent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据