4.4 Article

Oral delivery of anti-diabetes therapeutics using cell penetrating and transcytosing peptide strategies

期刊

PEPTIDES
卷 100, 期 -, 页码 24-35

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2017.12.014

关键词

Oral drug delivery; Peptide drugs; Nanoparticles; Cell penetrating peptides; Peptide permeability; Bioavailability; Human intestinal tissue; Transcytosis; Transepithelial transport

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7)/ERC [227845]
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council UK Regenerative Medicine Platform Hub Acellular Approaches for Therapeutic Delivery [MR/K026682/1]
  5. Punjab Educational Endowment Fund (PEEF) scholarship, Government of Punjab, Pakistan
  6. MRC [MR/K026682/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oral delivery of insulin and other anti-diabetic peptides is inhibited by low intestinal absorption caused by the poor permeability across cellular membranes and the susceptibility to enzymatic degradation in the gastrointestinal tract. Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) have been investigated for a number of years as oral absorption enhancers for hydrophilic macromolecules by electrostatic or covalent conjugation on in conjunction with nanotechnology. Endogenous cellular uptake mechanisms present in the intestine can be exploited by engineering peptide conjugates that transcytose; entering cells by endocytosis and leaving by exocytosis. Efficiently delivering hydrophilic and sensitive peptide drugs to safely transverse the digestive barrier with no effect on gut physiology using remains a key driver for formulation research. Here we review the use of CPP and transcytosis peptide approaches, their modification and use in delivering anti-diabetic peptides (with the primary example of Insulin and engineered homologues) by direct oral administration to treat diabetes and associated metabolic disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据