4.6 Article

Pilot study of novel lab methodology and testing of platelet function in adolescent women with heavy menstrual bleeding

期刊

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 83, 期 3, 页码 693-701

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/pr.2017.298

关键词

-

资金

  1. HRSA Award [H30MC24049]
  2. Doernbecher Children's Hospital Foundation-Friends of Doernbecher Grant
  3. National Institutes of Health [R01HL101972, R01GM116184]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Approximately 40% of adolescent women experience heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), and 10-62% of them have an underlying bleeding disorder (BD). Diagnosing a BD remains challenging because of limitations of available clinical platelet function assays. The aim of this study was to characterize platelet function in a population of adolescent women with HMB using small-volume whole-blood assays. METHODS: Anticoagulated whole blood was used to assess platelet GPIIbIIIa activation, alpha-granule secretion, and aggregation in response to multiple agonists. Platelet adhesion on collagen or von Willebrand Factor (VWF) under static and shear flow was also assessed. RESULTS: Fifteen participants with HMB were included in the study, of which eight were diagnosed with a clinically identifiable BD. Platelet activation was blunted in response to calcium ionophore in participants without a BD diagnosis compared with that in all other participants. Impaired GPIIbIIIa activation was observed in response to all GPCR agonists, except adenosine diphosphate (ADP), in participants with qualitative platelet disorders. Our assays detected platelet aggregation in the majority of participants with a BD in response to ADP, collagen-related peptide (CRP), thrombin receptor activator 6 (TRAP-6), or U46619. Platelet adhesion and aggregation on collagen and VWF was decreased for participants with VWD. CONCLUSION: Participants with and without BD exhibited aberrant platelet function in several assays in response to select agonists.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据