4.6 Article

The impact of reclamation cover depth on the performance of reclaimed shale overburden at an oil sands mine in Northern Alberta, Canada

期刊

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
卷 29, 期 12, 页码 2840-2854

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10229

关键词

reclamation; multilayer cover; optimal cover depth; oil sands

资金

  1. Syncrude Canada Ltd.
  2. National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. Cumulative Environmental Management Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multilayer covers are widely accepted reclamation designs in the oil sands region of northern Alberta, Canada, with an ultimate goal of revegetating to species characteristic of predisturbance native plant communities. To determine the optimal depth of reclamation material required to reclaim overburden shale from an oil sands mine, an evaluation was made of the long-term performance of six reclamation soil cover depths all placed over overburden. The measured soil water contents from different cover thicknesses at South Bison Hills located at the Syncrude Mine site north of Fort McMurray, Alberta, were used to calibrate and validate a dual-porosity model in HYDRUS-1D. The calibrated and validated model was then used to evaluate the influence of cover thickness and climatic variability on plant available water for forest growth. The frequency distributions of actual transpiration (T-r) for six cover treatments with a range of leaf area index (LAI) cases were developed. These T-r frequency distributions were then modified by coupling T-r and LAI. The modified frequency distributions for annual T-r for the six simulated cover thickness highlight the strong nonlinearity between the distributions of T-r over a long-term (60years) climate cycle in that incremental increases in cover thickness do not produce proportional increases in T-r. The results indicated that, once the cover thickness exceeds 100cm, there is little incremental increase in the median value of T-r over the 60-year climate cycle. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据