4.4 Article

Sources of parental hope in pediatric oncology

期刊

PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER
卷 65, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26981

关键词

communication; hope; meaning; palliative care; pediatric oncology

资金

  1. American Cancer Society Mentored Research Scholar [MRSG-08-010-01-CPPB]
  2. American Society of Clinical Oncology Career Development Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundHope is a multidimensional concept that is important for all parents of children with cancer. However, most work has focused on advanced cancer and poor prognoses. We examined hopes of all parents of children with cancer longitudinally during the first year of treatment. ProcedureProspective, longitudinal, questionnaire-based cohort study of parents and physicians of children with cancer at two academic pediatric hospitals. Parents reported on general sense of hopefulness and specific hopes at time of diagnosis (N=374); a subset of parents (N=164) were followed longitudinally at 4 and 12 months. ResultsFifty-five percent of parents (N=206/374) reported being extremely hopeful in general at baseline. Hopefulness did not significantly change over time, and most parents (51-58%) reported being extremely hopeful regardless of prognosis (P=0.66). Most parents (N=327/356) considered hope for cure to be an extremely important source of hope; most also reported hope that the child would feel loved (N=328/356), that the child would have the best possible quality of life (N=316/356), and that they would always do all they could for the child (N=300/356). Hope for cure was slightly lower among parents of children with less than a 50% chance of cure at baseline (N=53/63) when compared to those with better prognoses (moderately likely cure, N=76/78; very likely cure, N=198/215) (P=0.02). ConclusionsMany hopes contribute to parental hopefulness, not just hope for cure. This hopefulness persists over time, even when the prognosis is poor. Clinicians should focus on supporting the myriad hopes that contribute to overall hopefulness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据