4.7 Article

Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): the connection between metals, specific SFR and H I gas in galaxies: the Z-SSFR relation

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slt054

关键词

galaxies: abundances; galaxies: fundamental parameters; galaxies: star formation; galaxies: statistics

资金

  1. STFC (UK)
  2. ARC (Australia)
  3. AAO
  4. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  5. ARC [FS110200023]
  6. Australian Research Council [FS110200023] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
  7. STFC [ST/H008578/1, ST/I000976/1, ST/H00131X/1, ST/I505905/1, ST/I003088/1, ST/G001987/1, ST/J002291/1, ST/K003577/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J002291/1, ST/K003577/1, ST/H00131X/1, ST/I003088/1, ST/I000976/1, ST/G001987/1, ST/I505905/1, ST/H008578/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the interplay between gas phase metallicity (Z), specific star formation rate (SSFR) and neutral hydrogen gas (H i) for galaxies of different stellar masses. Our study uses spectroscopic data from Galaxy and Mass Assembly and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) star-forming galaxies, as well as H i detection from the Arecibo Legacy Fast Arecibo L-band Feed Array (ALFALFA) and Galex Arecibo SDSS Survey (GASS) public catalogues. We present a model based on the Z-SSFR relation that shows that at a given stellar mass, depending on the amount of gas, galaxies will follow opposite behaviours. Low-mass galaxies with a large amount of gas will show high SSFR and low metallicities, while low-mass galaxies with small amounts of gas will show lower SSFR and high metallicities. In contrast, massive galaxies with a large amount of gas will show moderate SSFR and high metallicities, while massive galaxies with small amounts of gas will show low SSFR and low metallicities. Using ALFALFA and GASS counterparts, we find that the amount of gas is related to those drastic differences in Z and SSFR for galaxies of a similar stellar mass.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据