4.4 Article

Ecofriendly synthesis of silver nanoparticles from commercially available plant powders and their antibacterial properties

期刊

SCIENTIA IRANICA
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 1049-1054

出版社

SHARIF UNIV TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.scient.2013.05.016

关键词

Biosynthesis; Silver nanoparticles; Plant-powder; Antimicrobial activity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Use of various plant materials for the biosynthesis of nanoparticles is considered a green technology, as it does not involve any harmful chemicals. The present study reports that silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) were synthesized from a silver nitrate solution by commercially available plant powders, such as Solanum tricobatum, Syzygium cumini, Centella asiatica and Citrus sinensis. Ag NPs were characterized by UV-vis spectrophotometer, X-Ray Diffractometer (XRD), Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The formation and stability of the reduced silver nanoparticles in the colloidal solution were monitored by UV-vis spectrophotometer analysis. The mean particle diameter of silver nanoparticles was calculated from the XRD pattern, according to the line width of the plane, and the refraction peak, using Scherrer's equation. AFM showed the irregular shapes of Ag NPs, and the formation of silver nanoparticles was found to be 53, 41, 52 and 42 nm, corresponding to Syzygium cumini, Citrus sinensis, Solanum tricobatum and Centella asiatica, respectively. FTIR spectroscopy confirmed the presence of protein as the stabilizing agent surrounding the Ag NPs. Antimicrobial activity of the silver bio-nanoparticles was performed by a well diffusion method. The highest antimicrobial activity of Ag NPs synthesized by C sinensis and C asiatica was found against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16 mm). The Ag NPs synthesized in this process were found to have efficient antimicrobial activity against pathogenic bacteria. (C) 2013 Sharif University of Technology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据