4.5 Article

Motivational interviewing training for medical students: A pilot pre-post feasibility study

期刊

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
卷 101, 期 11, 页码 1934-1941

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.06.011

关键词

Motivational interviewing; Communication skills; Continuing medical education; Interdisciplinary medical education

资金

  1. Infection, Immunology, Endocrinology Inflammation and Geriatric Units, Bicetre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, France
  2. French General Medical Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the impact of brief training in motivational interviewing (MI) from a non-specialist professional for medical students. Methods: Students (n = 20) received three four-hour sessions of MI training over one week. They interviewed caregivers acting as patients in two standardised medical situations, six weeks before and three weeks after training. Global scores from the MITI-3.1.1 code, including MI-Spirit, were attributed to the audiotaped interviews by two independent coders, blind the pre- or post-training status of the interview. Secondary outcomes were: caregivers' perception of students' empathy (CARE questionnaire), students' evaluation of self-efficacy to engage in a patient-centred relationship (SEPCQ score), and students' satisfaction with their own performance (analogue scale). Results: MI-Spirit score increased significantly after training (p < 0.0001, effect size 1.5). Limited improvements in CARE score (p = 0.034, effect size 0.5) and one of the SEPCQ dimensions (sharing information and power with the patient; p = 0.047, effect size 0.5) were also noted. Students' satisfaction score was unaffected (p = 0.69). Conclusion: These findings suggest that brief MI training can improve communication skills in medical students. Practice implications: Such an intervention is feasible and could be generalised during medical studies. (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据