4.5 Article

Preparation and gas-sensing performance of SnO2/NiO composite oxide synthesized by microwave-assisted liquid phase deposition

期刊

PARTICUOLOGY
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 118-125

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2018.03.003

关键词

SnO2/NiO composite powders; Microwave; Liquid phase deposition; Gas-sensing performance

资金

  1. Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation of China [ZR2015EL009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We synthesized SnO2/NiO composite oxides by microwave-assisted liquid phase deposition to improve their surface physico-chemical properties and gas-sensing selectivity, and we investigated how the molar ratio of Ni2+ to Sn4+ and the microwave power affected their gas-sensing performance. The microstructure, surface physico-chemical states, and morphology of the samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy, respectively. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms were used to characterize the specific surface areas of the samples. Our results showed that microwave-assisted liquid phase deposition increased the surface-adsorbed oxygen content and the specific surface area of the SnO2/NiO composite oxide from about 22 to 120 m(2)/g. When the molar ratio of Ni2+ to Sn4+ was 0.1, the gas response to 1000 ppm ethanol gas reached 84.7 at a lower working voltage of 3.5 V. However, the optimum working voltages for methanol and acetone gas were 4.5 and 4.0 V, respectively. Thus, a new method was found to improve the selectivity of the gas sensor. Moreover, at a working voltage of 4.0V, the gas response of a SnO2/NiO gas sensor synthesized by microwave-assisted liquid phase deposition with the optimum radiation power of 450W to 1000 ppm acetone gas was 49.7, twice that of a sensor synthesized by traditional liquid phase deposition. (C) 2018 Chinese Society of Particuology and Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据