4.3 Review

A sticky end for gastrointestinal helminths; the role of the mucus barrier

期刊

PARASITE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 40, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pim.12517

关键词

goblet cell; innate immunity; mucosal immunity; Nippostrongylus brasiliensis; Trichinella spiralis; Trichuris spp

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, DTP studentship
  2. Wellcome Trust [203128/Z/16/Z, 083620Z]
  3. Wellcome Trust [100290/Z/12/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [1618838] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Wellcome Trust [100290/Z/12/Z] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gastrointestinal (GI) nematodes are a group of successful multicellular parasites that have evolved to coexist within the intestinal niche of multiple species. It is estimated that over 10% of the world's population are chronically infected by GI nematodes, making this group of parasitic nematodes a major burden to global health. Despite the large number of affected individuals, there are few effective treatments to eradicate these infections. Research into GI nematode infections has primarily focused on defining the immunological and pathological consequences on host protection. One important but neglected aspect of host protection is mucus, and the concept that mucus is just a simple barrier is no longer tenable. In fact, mucus is a highly regulated and dynamic-secreted matrix, underpinned by a physical hydrated network of highly glycosylated mucins, which is increasingly recognized to have a key protective role against GI nematode infections. Unravelling the complex interplay between mucins, the underlying epithelium and immune cells during infection are a major challenge and are required to fully define the protective role of the mucus barrier. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge on mucins and the mucus barrier during GI nematode infections, with particular focus on murine models of infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据