4.4 Article

Small carbonaceous fossils (SCFs) from the Terreneuvian (lower Cambrian) of Baltica

期刊

PALAEONTOLOGY
卷 61, 期 3, 页码 417-439

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pala.12350

关键词

Cambrian explosion; small carbonaceous fossils; Terreneuvian; Lontova; acritarchs; Baltica

资金

  1. Churchill College, Cambridge
  2. Natural Environmental Research Council, UK [NE/K005251/1]
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/K005251/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. NERC [NE/K005251/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe a new assemblage of small carbonaceous fossils (SCFs) from diagenetically minimally altered clays and siltstones of Terreneuvian age from the Lontova and Voosi formations of Estonia, Lithuania and Russia. This is the first detailed account of an SCF assemblage from the Terreneuvian and includes a number of previously undocumented Cambrian organisms. Recognizably bilaterian-derived SCFs include abundant protoconodonts (total-group Chaetognatha), and distinctive cuticular spines of scalidophoran worms. Alongside these metazoan remains are a range of protistan-grade fossils, including Retiranus balticus gen. et sp. nov., a distinctive funnel-shaped or sheet-like problematicum characterized by terminal or marginal vesicles, and Lontohystrichosphaera grandis gen. et sp. nov., a large (100-550m) ornamented vesicular microfossil. Together these data offer a fundamentally enriched view of Terreneuvian life in the epicratonic seas of Baltica, from an episode where records of non-biomineralized life are currently sparse. Even so, the recovered assemblages contain a lower diversity of metazoans than SCF biotas from younger (Stage 4) Baltic successions that represent broadly equivalent environments, echoing the diversification signal recorded in the coeval shelly and trace-fossil records. Close comparison to the biostratigraphical signal from Fortunian small shelly fossils supports a late Fortunian age for most of the Lontova/Voosi succession, rather than a younger (wholly Stage 2) range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据