4.7 Article

Biostratigraphy, carbon isotopes and cyclostratigraphy of the Albian-Cenomanian transition and Oceanic Anoxic Event 1d in southern Tibet

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.03.005

关键词

ACBI; OAE 1d; Cretaceous; Spectral analysis; Youxia; Eastern Tethys

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41672104, 41422202]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Project) [2012CB822005]
  3. Key Laboratory of Sedimentary Basin and Paleogeography & Lithofacies, MLR [zdsys2014001]
  4. IGCP [609]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During the Albian and Cenomanian, the Earth underwent profound climatic and oceanographic changes that were recorded in sedimentary successions on a global scale. Carbon isotope records spanning this time interval have been established in the western Tethys, eastern Pacific and North Atlantic Oceans, but not yet in the eastern Tethys Ocean. In this paper, we present biostratigraphic, chemostratigraphic and cyclostratigraphic characteristics of the uppermost Albian-lowermost Cenomanian in an eastern Tethyan section (Youxia, southern Tibet). Based on calcareous nannofossil biozones and the bulk rock delta C-13 curve, the Albian-Cenomanian boundary interval (ACBI) was identified and correlated to the western Tethys and Atlantic Oceans. In the Youxia section, delta C-13 values range from approximately 0 parts per thousand to +1.3 parts per thousand (-0.03 parts per thousand to +1.31 parts per thousand). Four subevents (a, b, c and d) were distinguished in the ACBI carbon isotope curve via correlation with other sections. Based on a spectral analysis of the carbonate content, we recognized Milankovitch short eccentricity (similar to 100 kyr) and precession (22.2 kyr) cycles, suggesting that orbital variations modulated depositional processes. The duration of the ACBI was estimated at similar to 311 kyr, while OAE 1d lasted for similar to 233 kyr in the eastern Tethys Ocean, consistent with the duration calculated from Atlantic Ocean records.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据