4.7 Article

Late Devonian and Early Carboniferous alpha diversity, ecospace occupation, vertebrate assemblages and bio-events of southeastern Morocco

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.12.028

关键词

Fossillagerstatte; Famennian; Gnathostomes; Invertebrates; Palaeoecology; Sea level

资金

  1. Swiss National Fond [S-74602-11-01]
  2. NWO [VIDI 864.14.009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Late Devonian was a time of dramatic environmental perturbations affecting marine ecosystems. Both the Kellwasser (latest Frasnian) and the Hangenberg crises (latest Famennian) are primarily reported as phases of drastic decreases in marine diversity while the Hangenberg Crisis is also described as a bottleneck in vertebrate evolution. Fossil-bearing localities with Upper Devonian strata are of great interest to assess variations in the effects of environmental perturbations on biodiversity. For this purpose, we examined changes in alpha diversity and ecospace utilization of 21 Famennian (Late Devonian) and early Tournaisian (Early Carboniferous) invertebrate associations containing 9828 specimens from Madene el Mrakib and Aguelmous (southern Maider Basin, northeastern Anti-Atlas, Morocco), where some layers yield exceptionally preserved gnathostome remains. Both the invertebrate and vertebrate associations contain predominantly opportunistic and pelagic taxa indicating oxygen depletion near the seafloor in this region. Nevertheless, the ecospace extension was fluctuating and correlated with regional and/or global sea-level changes and oxygenation of bottom waters. In the Wider Basin, the ecospace was depleted after and during several bio-events such as the Kellwasser and Hangenberg crises, the Annulata event (middle Famennian) as well as during the early Tournaisian. Abiotic as well as biotic changes (instability of the invertebrate ecosystem) are considered to have influenced Famennian vertebrate diversity because they were more or less directly dependent on invertebrates as a food source.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据