4.7 Article

Timing of the late Jehol Biota: New geochronometric constraints from the Jixi Basin, NE China

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.11.063

关键词

Early Cretaceous; Chengzihe Formation; Non-marine bivalves; Early angiosperms; Zircon U-Pb dating

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41772205, 41330207]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M622823]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2016QNA3013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Jehol Biota is a world-famous Early Cretaceous terrestrial ecosystem in East Asia and has revealed exceptionally well preserved fossils which provide significant insights into the origin and evolution of birds and feathers, and the early diversifications of mammals and angiosperms. After the long-lived controversies over the timing of the biota varying from Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous in last century, the lifespan of the early-middle Jehol Biota has been precisely dated from Barremian to early Aptian (ca. 131-120 Ma) by a series of recent radiometric analyses. However, few well constrained ages are available for the late Jehol Biota, hindering our complete understanding of the evolutionary history of the terrestrial ecosystem. Alternating marine and non marine deposits of the Chengzihe Formation in eastern Heilongjiang have yielded a non-marine bivalve assemblage of the Jehol Biota, basal angiosperms, and Cretaceous marine index bivalves, which collectively offer crucial and indisputable clues against the prevailing Jurassic time of the biota since 1990s. Here we present the first discovery of tephra layers from the Chengzihe Formation, dated by zircon U-Pb geochronology as ca. 116-111 Ma, providing the first quantitative age calibration for the early angiosperms and the Jehol bivalve assemblage. Therefore, we demonstrate that the duration of the Jehol Biota extends to late Aptian-early Albian, approximately 4-9 Myr younger than the currently accepted age limits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据