4.6 Article

A randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial with the alpha 2/3/5 subunit selective GABA(A) positive allosteric modulator PF-06372865 in patients with chronic low back pain

期刊

PAIN
卷 159, 期 9, 页码 1742-1751

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001267

关键词

GABAA; Pain; Chronic low back pain

资金

  1. Pfizer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of PF-06372865, a subtype-selective positive allosteric modulator of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptor, on chronic low back pain was investigated in a randomised, placebo- and active-controlled phase 2 clinical trial. The parallel treatment group trial consisted of a 1-week single-blind placebo run in the phase, followed by 4-week double-blind treatment. Patients were randomised to receive either PF-06372865, naproxen, or placebo twice a day for 4 weeks. The primary end point was the numerical rating score of low back pain intensity after 4 weeks of active treatment. Secondary end points included the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised. The trial had predefined decision rules based on the probability that PF-06372865 was better than placebo. The study was stopped at the interim analysis for futility. At this time, a total of 222 patients were randomised and the mean PF-06372865 4-week response on the low back pain intensity was 0.16 units higher (worse) than placebo (90% confidence interval -20.28 to 0.60). There were small, statistically significant reductions in the delayed recall test score with PF-06372865, as measured by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised. The effects of naproxen were in line with expectations. PF-06372865 was well tolerated. The most common treatment-related adverse events in the PF-06372865 arm were somnolence (5 mild and 4 moderate), dizziness (2 mild and 3 moderate), and nausea (2 mild). Although the reason for the lack of analgesic effect is not completely clear, it may be a result of not achieving sufficient receptor occupancy to drive efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据