4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

The roles of environmental conditions and geographical distances on the species turnover of the whole phytoplankton and zooplankton communities and their subsets in tropical reservoirs

期刊

HYDROBIOLOGIA
卷 764, 期 1, 页码 171-186

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-015-2296-z

关键词

Beta diversity; Dispersal ability; Body size; Plankton communities

资金

  1. FURNAS Centrais Eletricas S.A.
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [309700/2013-2, 141650/2010-9]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the patterns of biological diversity between different regions (beta diversity) and how diversity is generated and maintained is a central goal in ecology. The relative roles of niche differentiation and geographical distances in shaping the phytoplankton and zooplankton structures are not yet fully determined, especially considering the subsets of species that share particular traits. We evaluated whether dissimilarity in phytoplankton and zooplankton assemblages depends on environmental distances and geographical distances on the whole communities and for subsets. We sampled eight hydroelectric reservoirs over a large scale (1500 km) in central Brazil, during three climatological periods. Phytoplankton composition was correlated with niche differentiation; that is, environmental similarity would account for assemblage similarity, due to the high dispersal abilities and low turnover rates of these organisms. For zooplankton, geographical distances were more important, which resulted in a stronger spatial structure with a greater dispersal limitation. For phytoplankton, the Morphologically Based Functional Group formed by diatoms, and for zooplankton, the three major taxonomic groups appeared as spatially structured. Therefore, phytoplankton composition was mostly correlated to niche differentiation and zooplankton to geographical distances; the communities deconstructed into subsets of species with similar traits refined the responses of the community structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据