4.5 Article

Clinical and genetic characteristics of Chinese patients with familial or sporadic pediatric cataract

期刊

ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-018-0828-0

关键词

Pediatric cataract; Next-generation sequencing; Variant; Nystagmus

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81230015, 81670896]
  2. CAMS Innovation Found for Medical Sciences [2016-I2M-1-002]
  3. Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission [Z151100003915078]
  4. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0905100]
  5. Liaoning Provincial Education Department Science and Technology Research Project [LK201653]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Pediatric cataract is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous disease which is a significant cause of lifelong visual impairment and treatable blindness. Our study aims to investigate the genotype spectrum in a group of Chinese patients with pediatric cataract. Methods: We enrolled 39 families with pediatric cataract from October 2015 to April 2016. DNA samples of the probands were analyzed by target next-generation sequencing. Variants were validated using Sanger sequencing in the probands and available family members. Results: In our cohort of 39 cases with different types of pediatric cataract, 23 cases were found to harbor putative pathogenic variants in 15 genes: CRYAA, CRYBA1, CRYBA4, CRYBB1, CRYGC, CRYGD, MIP, GCNT2, IARS2, NHS, BCOR, BFSP2, FYCO1, MAF, and PAX6. The mutation detection rates in the familial and sporadic cases were 75 and 47.8%, respectively. Of the 23 causative variants, over half were novel. Conclusions: This is a rare report of systematic mutation screening analysis of pediatric cataract in a comparably large cohort of Chinese patients. Our observations enrich the mutation spectrum of pediatric cataract. Next-generation sequencing provides significant diagnostic information for pediatric cataract cases, especially when considering sporadic and subtle syndromal cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据