4.5 Article

Comparison of n-alkane molecular, carbon and hydrogen isotope compositions of different types of plants in the Dajiuhu peatland, central China

期刊

ORGANIC GEOCHEMISTRY
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 1-11

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.07.008

关键词

Peatland plant; n-Alkane; delta D; delta C-13; Apparent isotopic fractionation

资金

  1. NSFC [41472308]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences [GBL11612]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [CUGCJ1703]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long chain n-alkanes preserved in peat deposits have been widely used to reconstruct paleoenvironmental and paleoecological changes. However, our knowledge of how the leaf wax molecular and isotopic compositions of peat sequences might respond to changes in plant communities is limited. This study investigates the n-alkane molecular, carbon and hydrogen isotopic compositions of plant species collected from the Dajiuhu peatland, central China. The results show that forb and graminoid plants growing in peatlands have a relatively higher carbon preference index of long-chain n-alkanes than shrubs, ferns and aquatic plants. The delta C-13 values of individual n-alkanes generally decrease with increasing chain lengths, and different plant groups have similar delta C-13 values of C-31 and C-33 n-alkanes. An exception is Sphagnum, which has more negative delta C-13 values of C-23 and C-25 than those of its longer chain length homologues. Relative to peat pore water delta D values in different seasons and different peat depths, the Dajiuhu plants normally exhibit relatively large hydrogen isotope fractionations, and the fractionations gradually increase from graminoid to forb to shrub. Taken together, these results highlight the influence of different kinds of vegetation on the collective molecular and isotopic ratios of n-alkanes in peat deposits. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据