4.6 Article

Theoretical perspective to light outcoupling and management in perovskite light-emitting diodes

期刊

ORGANIC ELECTRONICS
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 351-358

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.06.014

关键词

Perovskite LEDs; Light outcoupling; FDTD model; Power loss modes; Light management

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2014CB932600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91633301, 61520106012, 61522505, 11474214, 61722404]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0401002, 2016YFB0400700]
  4. Qing Lan Project, Bureau of Science and Technology of Suzhou Municipality [SYG201525]
  5. Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology
  6. Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the rapid development of high-efficiency perovskite light-emitting diodes (PeLEDs) via material design and morphology control, a comprehensive evaluation of the power loss among various optical modes has seldom been conducted for the precise design of device architectures. Here, a quantitative analysis of light outcoupling efficiency (n(out)) of PeLEDs is presented with the theoretical simulations by taking into account the key factors of refractive index and film thickness of various functional layers, and the emitter dipole orientation. For a planar PeLED, a rational design to enhance the n(out) is predicted by constructing multilayer stack in series of transparent electrode/high-index transport layer/perovskite emitter/low-index transport layer/reflective electrode. Furthermore, the role of photonic structures on the outcoupling management is explored, and the potential of a substantial increase in n(out) is demonstrated with an enhancement factor of over 1.75 by implementing a moth-eye nanostructure into the emitter. We anticipate that the findings shown here will provide the design guidelines for the optical optimization of PeLEDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据