4.6 Article

Morphological consequences of ligand exchange in quantum dot - Polymer solar cells

期刊

ORGANIC ELECTRONICS
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 119-125

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.12.018

关键词

Organic photovoltaics; Electron tomography; Quantum dot solar cells; Ligand exchange

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [1436273]
  2. Advanced Solar Technologies Institute
  3. UCMexus-CONACyT postdoctoral fellowship program
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1436273, 1437636] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  7. Directorate For Engineering [1149365] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mixtures of conjugated polymers and quantum dot nanocrystals present an interesting solution-processable materials system for active layers in optoelectronic devices, including solar cells. We use scanning transmission electron microscopy to investigate the effects of exchanging the capping ligand of quantum dots on the three-dimensional morphology of the film. We created 3D reconstructions for blends of poly((4,8-bis(octyloxy) benzo (1,2-b: 4,5-b')-dithiophene-2,6-diyl)(2-((dodecyloxy) carbonyl) thieno (3,4-b)-thiophenediyl)) (PTB1) and PbS quantum dots capped with oleic acid (OA), butylamine (BA), OA to 3-mercaptopropionic acid (MPA), and BA to MPA. We use these reconstructed volumes to evaluate differences in exciton dissociation and charge transport as a function of ligand processing. We show that the MPA exchange without an intermediate BA treatment results in severe changes to the film structure and a non-ideal morphology for an effective device. We also show that with a BA exchange, the morphology remains largely unchanged with the additional MPA treatment. This quantitative characterization elucidates previously reported device performance changes caused by ligand exchange and should inform future device fabrication protocols.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据