4.6 Article

Teaching an old scaffold new recognition tricks: oligopyrrolamide antagonists of IAPP aggregation

期刊

ORGANIC & BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 733-741

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ob02910a

关键词

-

资金

  1. New York University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A library of N-substituted oligopyrrolamides was designed to modulate the aggregation kinetics of islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP). IAPP is a hormonal peptide, co-secreted with insulin in the pancreatic beta-cells. IAPP samples a variety of conformations, starting from a native random coil to membrane-associated alpha-helical intermediates and eventually terminates in the amyloid plaques rich in beta-sheet structures. A growing body of evidence suggests that membrane bound alpha-helical intermediates are the key cytotoxic species that impair the functionality and viability of beta-cells and contribute to the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). The N-substituted oligopyrrolamides were screened against the aggregation of IAPP using amyloid kinetic assays. A tripyrrole, ADH-101, was the most effective antagonist of IAPP fibrillation in a physiologically relevant lipid membrane system as well as under de novo conditions. ADH-101 induces/stabilizes a secondary structure in IAPP which potentially affects its downstream functions. ADH-101 efficiently affects IAPP-mediated liposome leakage and cell toxicity in insulin secreting cells. ADH-101 inhibits the elongation process potentially binding to the monomeric IAPP and attenuating its access to the preformed fibers. More importantly, oligopyrrolamides are better inhibitors of IAPP aggregation than analogous oligopyridylamides and have more desirable biological properties reflected by their partition coefficients. In essence, an oligopyrrolamide scaffold has been designed which modulates the membrane bound helical intermediates of IAPP and affects their downstream functions such as oligomerization, membrane poration, and cytotoxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据