4.5 Article

Alstrom Syndrome: Mutation Spectrum of ALMS1

期刊

HUMAN MUTATION
卷 36, 期 7, 页码 660-668

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.22796

关键词

ALMS1; Alstrom Syndrome; ciliopathy; SNV

资金

  1. Alstrom Syndrome International (Mt. Desert, ME)
  2. Alstrom Angels (Lubbock, TX)
  3. Alstrom Syndrome Canada (Finch, Ontario)
  4. National Institutes of Health [NIH-HD36878]
  5. Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique National Alstrom [PHRC N5514]
  6. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR) [prot. 2005060925_002]
  7. EURO-WABB: an EU rare diseases registry for Wolfram syndrome
  8. European Union [2010 12 05]
  9. Children's Mercy Hospital
  10. Marion Merrell Dow Foundation
  11. William T. Kemper Foundation
  12. Pat & Gil Clements Foundation
  13. Claire Giannini Foundation
  14. Black Veatch [U19HD077693]
  15. US. Public Health Service (PHS) [CA34196]
  16. National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alstrom Syndrome (ALMS), a recessive, monogenic ciliopathy caused by mutations in ALMS1, is typically characterized by multisystem involvement including early cone-rod retinal dystrophy and blindness, hearing loss, childhood obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiomyopathy, fibrosis, and multiple organ failure. The precise function of ALMS1 remains elusive, but roles in endosomal and ciliary transport and cell cycle regulation have been shown. The aim of our study was to further define the spectrum of ALMS1 mutations in patients with clinical features of ALMS. Mutational analysis in a world-wide cohort of 204 families identified 109 novel mutations, extending the number of known ALMS1 mutations to 239 and highlighting the allelic heterogeneity of this disorder. This study represents the most comprehensive mutation analysis in patients with ALMS, identifying the largest number of novel mutations in a single study worldwide. Here, we also provide an overview of all ALMS1 mutations identified to date. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据