4.5 Article

Two Siblings with Homozygous Pathogenic Splice-Site Variant in Mitochondrial Asparaginyl-tRNA Synthetase (NARS2)

期刊

HUMAN MUTATION
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 222-231

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.22728

关键词

NARS2; mitochondria; mitochondrial aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase; combined oxidative phosphorylation deficiency

资金

  1. FWO (Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek) [G.0666.06]
  2. Special Research Fund (BOF) from the Ghent University [B/00559/0]
  3. Medical Research Council, UK [MC_U105697135]
  4. MRC [MC_U105697135] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [MC_U105697135] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A homozygous missense mutation (c.822G>C) was found in the gene encoding the mitochondrial asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase (NARS2) in two siblings born to consanguineous parents. These siblings presented with different phenotypes: one had mild intellectual disability and epilepsy in childhood, whereas the other had severe myopathy. Biochemical analysis of the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) complexes in both siblings revealed a combined complex I and IV deficiency in skeletal muscle. In-gel activity staining after blue native-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis confirmed the decreased activity of complex I and IV, and, in addition, showed the presence of complex V subcomplexes. Considering the consanguineous descent, homozygosity mapping and whole-exome sequencing were combined revealing the presence of one single missense mutation in the shared homozygous region. The c.822G>C variant affects the 3 splice site of exon 7, leading to skipping of the whole exon 7 and a part of exon 8 in the NARS2 mRNA. In EBV-transformed lymphoblasts, a specific decrease in the amount of charged mt-tRNA(Asn) was demonstrated as compared with controls. This confirmed the pathogenic nature of the variant. To conclude, the reported variant in NARS2 results in a combined OXPHOS complex deficiency involving complex I and IV, making NARS2 a new member of disease-associated aaRS2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据