4.5 Article

The Effects of PMM2-CDG-Causing Mutations on the Folding, Activity, and Stability of the PMM2 Protein

期刊

HUMAN MUTATION
卷 36, 期 9, 页码 851-860

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.22817

关键词

phosphomannomutase 2; PMM2; congenital disorders of glycosylation; PMM2-CDG; protein stability

资金

  1. Fundacion Ramon Areces grant
  2. MINECO [IPT-2012-0561-010000, PI11/01250]
  3. Ramon y Cajal grant from the Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Congenital disorder of glycosylation type Ia (PMM2-CDG), the most common form of CDG, is caused by mutations in the PMM2 gene that reduce phosphomannomutase 2 (PMM2) activity. No curative treatment is available. The present work describes the functional analysis of nine human PMM2 mutant proteins frequently found in PMM2-CDG patients and also two murine Pmm2 mutations carried by the unique PMM2-CDG mouse model described to overcome embryonic lethality. The effects of the mutations on PMM2/Pmm2 stability, oligomerization, and enzyme activity were explored in an optimized bacterial system. The mutant proteins were associated with an enzymatic activity of up to 47.3% as compared with wild type (WT). Stability analysis performed using differential scanning fluorimetry and a bacterial transcription-translation-coupled system allowed the identification of several destabilizing mutations (p.V44A, p.D65Y, p.R123Q, p.R141H, p.R162W, p.F207S, p.T237M, p.C241S). Exclusion chromatography identified one mutation, p.P113L, that affected dimer interaction. Expression analysis of the p.V44A, p.D65Y, p.R162W, and p.T237M mutations in a eukaryotic expression system under permissive folding conditions showed the possibility of recovering their associated PMM2 activity. Together, the results suggest that some loss-of-function mutations detected in PMM2-CDG patients could be destabilizing, and therefore PMM2 activity could be, in certain cases, rescuable via the use of synergetic proteostasis modulators and/or chaperones. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据