4.6 Article

Near-infrared optical image transport through an all-solid tellurite optical glass rod with transversely-disordered refractive index profile

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 26, 期 13, 页码 16054-16062

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.26.016054

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [15H02250]
  2. JSPS-CERN joint research program [17K18891]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K18891] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For the first time, an all-solid tellurite optical glass rod with a transversely disordered refractive index profile was fabricated successfully as a medium to study the transverse localization of light and near-infrared (NIR) optical image transport. Two tellurite glass compositions of 70TeO(2)-8Li(2)O-17WO(3)-3MoO(3)-2Nb(2)O-5 (TLWMN) and 75TeO(2)-15ZnO-5Na(2)O-5La(2)O(3) (TZNL) which have a small difference in softening temperature (about 0.5 degrees C), compatible thermal expansions from room to 400 degrees C and broad transmission range from about 0.4 up to 6.0 gm were developed for a successful fabrication process. The tellurite transversely disordered optical rod (TDOR) consists of high and low-index units (TLWMN and TZNL, respectively). The diameter of each unit is 1.0 gm and their refractive index difference was about 0.095 at 1.55 mu m. Experimental results showed that after a CW probe beam at 1.55 gm propagated in a 10-cm-long tellurite TDOR, the beam became localized. In addition, NIR optical images at 1.55 mu m of numbers on a test target were transported. The captured images at the output facet of the tellurite TDOR are visually clear with high contrast and high brightness. The quality of our transported optical images can be comparable or higher than the results which were obtained by a polymer Anderson localized fiber and by a commercially available multicore imaging optical fiber. (C) 2018 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据