4.5 Article

Flexible, Scalable, and Efficient Targeted Resequencing on a Benchtop Sequencer for Variant Detection in Clinical Practice

期刊

HUMAN MUTATION
卷 36, 期 3, 页码 379-387

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/humu.22739

关键词

targeted resequencing; NGS; uniform target enrichment; clinical implementation; ISO15189 accreditation

资金

  1. GOA, Ghent University [BOF10/GOA/019]
  2. Spearhead financing Ghent University Hospital
  3. FWO. (Research Foundation-Flanders)
  4. Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The release of benchtop next-generation sequencing (NGS) instruments has paved the way to implement the technology in clinical setting. The need for flexible, qualitative, and cost-efficient workflows is high. We used singleplex-PCR for highly efficient target enrichment, allowing us to reach the quality standards set in Sanger sequencing-based diagnostics. For the library preparation, a modified NexteraXT protocol was used, followed by sequencing on a MiSeq instrument. With an innovative pooling strategy, high flexibility, scalability, and cost-efficiency were obtained, independent of the availability of commercial kits. The approach was validated for approximate to 250 genes associated with monogenic disorders. An overall sensitivity (>99%) similar to Sanger sequencing was observed in combination with a positive predictive value of >98%. The distribution of coverage was highly uniform, guaranteeing a minimal number of gaps to be filled with alternative methods. ISO15189-accreditation was obtained for the workflow. A major asset of the singleplex PCR-based enrichment is that new targets can be easily implemented. Diagnostic laboratories have validated assays available ensuring that the proposed workflow can easily be adopted. Although our platform was optimized for constitutional variant detection of monogenic disease genes, it is now also used as a model for somatic mutation detection in acquired diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据