4.6 Article

1.6 μm dissipative soliton fiber laser mode-locked by cesium lead halide perovskite quantum dots

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 7155-7162

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.26.007155

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Key Research and Development Project of Ministry of Science and Technology [2016YFC0801200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61705023, 61635004, 61405020, 61520106012]
  3. National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents [BX201600200]
  4. General Financial Grant from the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M610589]
  5. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Chongqing [Xm2017047]
  6. Science Foundation of Chongqing [CSTC2017JCYJA0651]
  7. Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Chongqing [CSTC2014JCYJJQ40002]
  8. Science and Technology on Plasma Physics Laboratory [6142A0403050817]
  9. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [106112017CDJXY120004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We demonstrate a stable, picosecond fiber laser mode-locked by cesium lead halide perovskite quantum dots (CsPbBr3-QDs). The saturable absorber is produced by depositing the CsPbBr3-QDs nanocrystals onto the endface of a fiber ferrule through light pressure. A balanced two-detector measurement shows that it has a modulation depth of 2.5% and a saturation power of 17.29 MW/cm(2). After incorporating the fabricated device into an Er3+-doped fiber ring cavity with a net normal dispersion of 0.238 ps(2), we obtain stable dissipative soliton with a pulse duration of 14.4 ps and a center wavelength at 1600 nm together with an edge-to-dege bandwidth of 4.5 nm. The linear chirped phase can be compensated by 25 m single mode fiber, resulting into a compressed pulse duration of 1.046 ps. This experimental works proves that such CsPbBr3-QDs materials are effective choice for ultrafast laser operating with devious mode-locking states. (C) 2018 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据