4.5 Article

Integration of disease association and eQTL data using a Bayesian colocalisation approach highlights six candidate causal genes in immune-mediated diseases

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 24, 期 12, 页码 3305-3313

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddv077

关键词

-

资金

  1. JDRF [9-2011-253]
  2. Wellcome Trust [091157, 100140, 089989, 099772]
  3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
  4. European Union [241447]
  5. Eli Lilly and Company
  6. Wellcome Trust
  7. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10275, NF-SI-0513-10143] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The genes and cells that mediate genetic associations identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are only partially understood. Several studies that have investigated the genetic regulation of gene expression have shown that disease-associated variants are over-represented amongst expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) variants. Evidence for colocalisation of eQTL and disease causal variants can suggest causal genes and cells for these genetic associations. Here, we used colocalisation analysis to investigate whether 595 genetic associations to ten immune-mediated diseases are consistent with a causal variant that regulates, in cis, gene expression in resting B cells, and in resting and stimulated monocytes. Previously published candidate causal genes were over-represented amongst genes exhibiting colocalisation (odds ratio > 1.5), and we identified evidence for colocalisation (posterior odds > 5) between cis eQTLs in at least one cell type and at least one disease for six genes: ADAM15, RGS1, CARD9, LTBR, CTSH and SYNGR1. We identified cell-specific effects, such as for CTSH, the expression of which in monocytes, but not in B cells, may mediate type 1 diabetes and narcolepsy associations in the chromosome 15q25.1 region. Our results demonstrate the utility of integrating genetic studies of disease and gene expression for highlighting causal genes and cell types.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据