4.4 Article

Mapping Cortical Atrophy in Parkinson's Disease Patients with Dementia

期刊

JOURNAL OF PARKINSONS DISEASE
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 69-76

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JPD-120151

关键词

Parkinson's disease; dementia; magnetic resonance imaging; MRI; brain atrophy; cortical atrophy; gray matter atrophy

资金

  1. NIA [K23 AG026803, AG16570]
  2. Turken Foundation
  3. NIBIB [EB01651]
  4. NLM [LM05639]
  5. NCRR [RR019771, P41RR013642]
  6. NIMH [R01 MH071940]
  7. NIH [U54 RR021813]
  8. Novartis
  9. Merck Serono
  10. Lundbeck
  11. GE Health
  12. Norwegian Parkinson Research Foundation
  13. Western Norway Health Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Cognitive impairment is very common in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Brain changes accompanying cognitive decline in PD are still not fully established. Methods: We applied cortical pattern matching and cortical thickness analyses to the three-dimensional T1-weighted brain MRI scans of 14 age-matched cognitively normal elderly (NC), 12 cognitively normal PD (PDC), and 11 PD dementia (PDD) subjects. We used linear regression models to investigate the effect of diagnosis on cortical thickness. All maps were adjusted for multiple comparisons using permutation testing with a threshold p < 0.01. Results: PDD showed significantly thinner bilateral sensorimotor, perisylvian, lateral parietal, as well as right posterior cingulate, parieto-occipital, inferior temporal and lateral frontal cortices relative to NC (left p(corrected) = 0.06, right p(corrected) = 0.009). PDD showed significantly thinner bilateral sensorimotor, right frontal and right parietal-occipital cortices relative to PDC (right p(corrected) = 0.05). The absolute difference in cortical thickness between PDD and the other diagnostic groups ranged from 3% to 19%. Conclusion: Our data shows that cognitive decline in PD is associated with cortical atrophy. PDD subjects have the most widespread gray matter atrophy suggesting more cortical involvement as PD patients progress to dementia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据