4.6 Article

An efficient visible light driven bismuth ferrite incorporated bismuth oxyiodide (BiFeO3/BiOI) composite photocatalytic material for degradation of pollutants

期刊

OPTICAL MATERIALS
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 227-235

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2018.06.067

关键词

BiFeO3/BiOI composite; Photocatalysis; Visible light; Rhodamine B; Bisphenol A; Degradation

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University [RG-1438-087]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An efficient BiFeO3/BiOI composite photocatalytic material was fabricated via simple wet impregnation process and photocatalytic performances were evaluated by the catalytic degradation of Rhodamine B (RhB) and bisphenol A (BPA) in visible-light illumination. Structural, light absorption and morphological features of the fabricated photocatalysts were investigated by various spectroscopic and microscopic procedures. The photodegradation efficiency results demonstrated that the BiFeO3/BiOI composite with 2 wt% loading of BiFeO3 (2% BiFeO3/BiOI) displayed the higher photocatalytic activity than various other BiFeO3 loadings, pristine BiOI and BiFeO3. A maximal photodegradation efficiency of RhB and BPA are similar to 100% and 71% were accomplished using the optimized composite when compared to merely similar to 56% and similar to 36% using pristine BiOI, respectively. The significant enhancement in the photodegradation rates of RhB (similar to 5 times) and BPA (similar to 2 times) pollutants using 2% BiFeO3/BiOI composite is credited to the efficient charge separation of photoinduced hole-electron pairs by transferring the electrons from BiOI to BiFeO3 catalyst surface. The photostability results revealed that the compost was retained their photocatalytic activity up to 3 cycles of degradation experiments. The higher photocatalytic activity, long time stability and reusability tests exposed that the BiFeO3/BiOI composite might be a potential photocatalytic material for topical applications in the field of water treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据