期刊
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS
卷 45, 期 2, 页码 536-546出版社
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0257-2
关键词
Effect size; Practical significance; Analysis of variance; Homogeneity of variance; Type I error; Power; Eta squared; Epsilon squared; Omega squared
Previous simulation research has focused on evaluating the impact of analytic assumption violations on statistics related to the F test and associated p(CALCULATED) values. The present article evaluated the bias of classical estimates of practical significance (i.e., effect size sample estimators (eta) over cap (2), (epsilon) over cap (2), and (omega) over cap (2)) in a one-way between-subjects univariate ANOVA when assumptions are violated. The simulation conditions modeled were selected on the basis of prior empirical research. Estimated (1) sampling error bias and (2) precision computed for each of the three effect size estimates for the 5,000 samples drawn for each of the 270 (5 parameter Cohen's d values x 3 group size ratios x 3 population distribution shapes x 3 variance ratios x 2 total ns) conditions were modeled for each of the k = 2, 3, and 4 group analyses. Our results corroborate the limited previous related research and suggest that (eta) over cap2 should not be used as an ANOVA effect size estimator, even though (eta) over cap (2) is the only available choice in the menus in most commonly available software.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据