4.6 Article

Suppression of Melatonin Secretion in Totally Visually Blind People by Ocular Exposure to White Light Clinical Characteristics

期刊

OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 125, 期 8, 页码 1160-1171

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.036

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cephalon Inc
  2. Mary Ann & Stanley Snider via Combined Jewish Philanthropies
  3. National Football League Charities
  4. Optum
  5. Philips Respironics, Inc
  6. ResMed Foundation
  7. San Francisco Bar Pilots
  8. Schneider Inc
  9. Sysco
  10. Cephalon, Inc
  11. Jazz Pharmaceuticals
  12. Takeda Pharmaceuticals
  13. Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries, Ltd
  14. Sanofi-Aventis, Inc
  15. Sepracor, Inc
  16. Wake Up Narcolepsy
  17. Bose Corporation
  18. Boston Celtics
  19. Boston Red Sox
  20. Columbia River Bar Pilots
  21. Institute of Digital Media and Child Development
  22. Klarman Family Foundation
  23. Samsung Electronics
  24. Quest Diagnostics, Inc
  25. Vanda Pharmaceuticals
  26. Zurich Insurance Company, Ltd
  27. Biological Illuminations LLC
  28. F. Lux Software LLC
  29. BHP Billiton
  30. Informa Exhibitions
  31. Teague
  32. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01 NS40982, R01 NS040982]
  33. Wellcome Trust, United Kingdom [060018/B/99/Z]
  34. National Center for Research Resources [M01-RR02635]
  35. Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center, from the National Center for Research Resources [1 UL1 RR025758]
  36. Cephalon Clinical Fellowship in Circadian Medicine, Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School
  37. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute fellowship in the program of training in Sleep, Circadian and Respiratory Neurobiology at Brigham and Women's Hospital [T32 HL079010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Although most totally visually blind individuals exhibit nonentrained circadian rhythms due to an inability of light to entrain the circadian pacemaker, a small proportion retain photic circadian entrainment, melatonin suppression, and other nonimage-forming responses to light. It is thought that these responses to light persist because of the survival of melanospin-containing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs), which project primarily to the circadian pacemaker and are functionally distinct from the rod and cone photoreceptors that mediate vision. We aimed to assess the integrity of nonimage-forming photoreception in totally visually blind patients with a range of ocular disorders. Design: Within-subject, dark-controlled design. Participants: A total of 18 totally visually blind individuals (7 females; mean age +/- standard deviation = 49.8 +/- 11.0 years) with various causes of blindness, including 3 bilaterally enucleated controls. Methods: Melatonin concentrations were compared during exposure to a 6.5-hour bright white light (similar to 7000 lux) with melatonin concentrations measured 24 hours earlier at the corresponding clock times under dim-light (4 lux) conditions. Main Outcome Measures: Area under the curve (AUC) for melatonin concentration. Results: Melatonin concentrations were significantly suppressed (defined as >= 33% suppression) during the bright-light condition compared with the dim-light condition in 5 of 15 participants with eyes (retinitis pigmentosa, n = 2; retinopathy of prematurity [ROP], n = 2; bilateral retinal detachments, n = 1). Melatonin concentrations remained unchanged in response to light in the remaining 10 participants with eyes (ROP, n = 3; optic neuritis/neuropathy, n = 2; retinopathy unknown, n = 2; congenital glaucoma, n = 1; congenital rubella syndrome, n = 1; measles retinopathy, n = 1) and in all 3 bilaterally enucleated participants. Conclusions: These data confirm that light-induced suppression of melatonin remains functionally intact in a minority of totally visually blind individuals with eyes. None of the bilaterally enucleated individuals or those with phthisis bulbi was responsive to light; of the remainder, half were responsive to light. Although inner retinal damage is associated with a high likelihood that nonimage-forming photoreception is absent, the impact of outer retinal damage is more ambiguous, and therefore the assessment of the presence, attenuation, or absence of nonimage-forming light responses in totally blind patients requires careful individual confirmation and cannot simply be assumed from the type of blindness. (C) 2018 by the American Academy ofOphthalmology. This is an open access article under the CCBY-NC-NDlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据