4.4 Article

Downregulation of MicroRNA-135 Promotes Sensitivity of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer to Gefitinib by Targeting TRIM16

期刊

ONCOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 26, 期 7, 页码 1005-1014

出版社

COGNIZANT COMMUNICATION CORP
DOI: 10.3727/096504017X15144755633680

关键词

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); miR-135; Sensitivity to gefitinib; TRIM16; JAK/STAT pathway

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Personalized treatment targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) may be a promising new treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gefitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the first drug for NSCLC, which unfortunately easily leads to drug resistance. Our study aimed to explore the functional role of microRNA (miR)-135 in the sensitivity to gefitinib of NSCLC cells. Expression of miR-135 in normal cells and NSCLC cells was assessed, followed by the effects of abnormally expressed miR-135 on cell viability, migration, invasion, apoptosis, sensitivity to gefitinib, and the expression levels of adhesion molecules and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in H1650 and H1975 cells. Next, the possible target gene of miR-135 was screened and verified. Finally, the potential involvement of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway was investigated. Expression of miR-135 was upregulated in NSCLC cells, and miR-135 silencing repressed cell viability, migration, and invasion, but increased cell apoptosis and sensitivity to gefitinib. E-cadherin and beta-catenin were significantly upregulated, but PD-L1 was downregulated by the silencing of miR-135. Subsequently, tripartite-motif (TRIM) 16 was screened and verified to be a target gene of miR-135, and miR-135 suppression was shown to function through upregulation of TRIM16 expression. Phosphorylated levels of the key kinases in the JAK/STAT pathway were reduced by silencing miR-135 by targeting TRIM16. In conclusion, miR-135 acted as a tumor promoter, and its suppression could improve sensitivity to gefitinib by targeting TRIM16 and inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据