4.5 Review

Application of single-cell genomics in cancer: promise and challenges

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 24, 期 -, 页码 R74-R84

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddv235

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre Programme
  3. UK Research Councils Open Access Block Grant
  4. MRC [MC_PC_13073, MC_UU_12009/16, MC_PC_14131, MR/L006340/1, MR/M00919X/1, G84/6443] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/M00919X/1, MC_PC_14131, MR/L006340/1, MC_PC_13073, MC_UU_12009/16, G84/6443] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Rosetrees Trust [M435] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent advances in single-cell genomics are opening up unprecedented opportunities to transform cancer genomics. While bulk tissue genomic analysis across large populations of tumour cells has provided key insights into cancer biology, this approach does not provide the resolution that is critical for understanding the interaction between different genetic events within the cellular hierarchy of the tumour during disease initiation, evolution, relapse and metastasis. Single-cell genomic approaches are uniquely placed to definitively unravel complex clonal structures and tissue hierarchies, account for spatiotemporal cell interactions and discover rare cells that drive metastatic disease, drug resistance and disease progression. Here we present five challenges that need to be met for single-cell genomics to fulfil its potential as a routine tool alongside bulk sequencing. These might be thought of as being challenges related to samples (processing and scale for analysis), sensitivity and specificity of mutation detection, sources of heterogeneity (biological and technical), synergies (from data integration) and systems modelling. We discuss these in the context of recent advances in technologies and data modelling, concluding with implications for moving cancer research into the clinic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据