4.8 Article

miR-139-5p inhibits aerobic glycolysis, cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma via a reciprocal regulatory interaction with ETS1

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 37, 期 12, 页码 1624-1636

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41388-017-0057-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Nation's Nature Science Foundation of China [81472711, 91540111, 81672756, 81401180, 81372283]
  2. Guangdong Province Nature Science Foundation [2014A030311013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer cells have metabolic features that allow them to preferentially metabolize glucose through aerobic glycolysis, providing them with a progression advantage. However, microRNA (miRNA) regulation of aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells has not been extensively investigated. We addressed this in the present study by examining the regulation of miR-139-5p on aerobic glycolysis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using clinical specimens, HCC cells, and a mouse xenograft model. We found that overexpressing miR-139-5p restrained aerobic glycolysis, suppressing proliferation, migration, and invasion in HCC cells. miR-139-5p regulated hexokinase 1 (HK1) and 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 3 (PFKFB3) expression by directly targeting the transcription factor ETS1, which bound to the promoters of the HK1 and PFKFB3 genes. miR-139-5p-induced aerobic glycolysis, proliferation, migration, and invasion were reversed by ETS1 overexpression, while ETS1 silencing induced the expression of miR-139-5p via a post-transcriptional regulation mode involving Drosha. miR-139-5p expression was reduced in HCC compared to para-carcinoma tissue, which was confirmed in The Cancer Genome Atlas and GSE54751 HCC cohorts. Notably, the lower expression of mir-139 was correlated with worse prognosis. These outcomes indicate that reciprocal regulatory interactions between miR-139-5p and ETS1 modulate aerobic glycolysis, proliferation, and metastasis in HCC cells, suggesting new targets for HCC treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据